Thankfully, we now know. I suppose in one regard we should be thankful they took care not to be too much of a PITA and pour fake blood coming out of Lincoln’s head. On the other though, do they really think Obama needed convincing on global warming, seeing how it was such a big part of his campaign? They got PR, sure, but save that shit for the non-believers, no? By the way, I appreciate great placement as much as anyone, but Greenpeace can’t be under the delusional illusion that being both politican and leader are mutually exclusive, can they?
2 comments:
that's exactly the point..... the environment was a big part of his CAMPAIGN, but it has not been a big part of his administration. in fact, he's does nothing except sit back and watch congress put forward an incredibly weak climate bill that favors coal companies more than anyone.
and no, i dont think they are implying that being a leader and a politician are mutually exclusive..... they are saying that they're not the same
I understand the campaign thing, but my point is that they sure seem to imply that a true leader won’t cave in on their convictions for the sake of satisfying a particular constituency, and I’m saying it happens all the time.
Post a Comment